Case Study: Retail Storefront (Brainerd, Minnesota)
A costume rental store and balloon decor studio providing custom balloon installations for events.
Engagement Snapshot
- Results: Optimization & Preparation for Sale
- Engagement Dates: 2020 to 2023
- Industry: Retail Storefront
- Location: Brainerd, Minnesota
- Team: 4 on staff

References Policy
My work with clients is confidential by default. Most engagements involve sensitive operational details, financial context, internal team dynamics, and customer data. I do not disclose client information, internal documents, or private communications unless the client has explicitly authorized it.Any public examples on this website are shared only to the extent a client has approved. In some cases, clients have given permission for limited disclosure such as photos together, a short written quote, or select clips from recorded coaching sessions. When those assets appear, they reflect client consent for that specific use only and do not imply broader permission to share additional details.If you are considering hiring me and would like references, I can provide them when appropriate, subject to client availability and confidentiality constraints. In all cases, I will protect client privacy and honor any restrictions requested by the client.Executive Summary
The company was growing as a specialized balloon decor studio, but day-to-day operations were overly dependent on the Owner. Work lived in the Owner’s head, handoffs were fragile, and execution relied on repeated reminders to employees rather than a reliable tasking and SOP system. That created constant firefighting and emotional load, and it limited delegation even when help was available.
- Engagement span: December 22, 2020 to January 02, 2024 (38 coaching sessions).
- Operational outcome: Owner left town on vacation with reduced stress after installing systems that provided visibility on the company.
- Operational outcome: Onboarding SOPs reduced repeated interruptions and re-explaining basic facility orientation items.
Starting Point: What Was Breaking
- Owner carried too many decisions and interruptions, creating a single point of failure for execution.
- Operational work was vulnerable to missed handoffs because tasks were remembered instead of systemized.
- Hiring, training, and delegation lacked consistent structure, so employees could not reliably execute without the Owner.
- Technology and documentation created friction because use was inconsistent.
- Decision-making was noisy, mixing urgent interruptions with daily activies, which kept the business in reactive mode.
- Financial structure questions existed around overhead, including rent relative to revenue scale.
Objectives for the Engagement
- Reduce Owner dependency by building systems that allow work to continue when the Owner is away.
- Improve follow-through by creating a repeatable operating cadence for priorities, decisions, and accountability.
- Convert tribal knowledge into SOPs and training routines that make employee performance more consistent.
- Simplify onboarding so the same basics are not repeatedly explained, reducing daily interruptions.
- Increase decision quality by separating urgent noise from daily activies and focusing execution on high-leverage fixes.
- Improve financial clarity around major overhead commitments using the business’s real revenue scale.
What I Changed: The Interventions
Operating Cadence and Accountability
- Established a weekly rhythm for decisions, priorities, and follow-up so tasks stopped slipping.
- Reinforced clear ownership and visibility for work so completion did not depend on repeated reminders.
- Practiced constraint-first problem solving by identifying the biggest bottleneck and addressing it before chasing secondary issues.
- Implemented decision hygiene by defining what mattered now, what could wait, and what should be delegated.
Financial Visibility and Decision Support
- Separated immediate cash questions from structural questions to reduce reactive, stress-driven decisions.
- Created a habit of framing decisions in simple ratios and constraints rather than gut feel, where the source materials provided numbers.
Sales Follow-Up and Pipeline Discipline
- Designed workflows to keep revenue-producing operations moving without the Owner on-site.
- Shifted execution expectations from “Owner remembers” to “system produces follow-up,” using documented routines and ownership.
- Reduced reliance on ad hoc communication by capturing repeatable steps into checklists and training routines.
Process, Tools, and Delivery Systems
- Built an SOP library by capturing instructions at the moment problems occurred, then using SOPs as the default training tool.
- Created onboarding scripts that standardized basic training and reduced repeated interruptions for routine questions.
- Implemented employee follow-through routines that included consistent expectations and predictable consequences.
- Focused on operational leverage so the business could earn revenue during Owner absence through documented, repeatable execution.
Outcomes
The outcomes were driven less by a single “big change” and more by compounding reliability. By converting recurring work into SOPs, standardizing onboarding, and reinforcing ownership and cadence, the business reduced dependence on the Owner’s memory and availability. That shift made it easier for employees to execute consistently and for the Owner to make decisions with less stress and fewer interruptions.
Timeline of Key Moments
- December 22, 2020 – Engagement begins; baseline financial context discussed.
- January 19, 2021 – Owner describes taking advice and capturing it as an SOP, reinforcing the “document it once, train from it” habit.
- February 23, 2021 – Owner reports leaving town, still making money, and feeling less stressed because systems were in place.
- November 08, 2022 – Owner publicly thanks Dave in a live presentation on stage and describes value in narrowing problems and solving them and the benefits of SOP-driven onboarding eliminating repeating basic explanations for two years.
- January 02, 2024 – Engagement concluded.
Why This Worked
The engagement treated growth and stability as an operations problem, not a personality problem. The starting condition was a capable Owner with too much cognitive load and too many invisible dependencies. The work reduced tool-and-knowledge sprawl by capturing what mattered into a small set of repeatable practices: documented SOPs, onboarding scripts, and a cadence for follow-through.
Follow-through improved because it became measurable and visible. Instead of relying on memory and reminders, work was assigned with ownership and reinforced through routines. That created a predictable execution layer that did not require the Owner to be present for every decision and handoff.
Tribal knowledge became transferable when it was documented at the moment friction appeared. The SOP library was not an abstract documentation project. It was built as real problems occurred, then immediately used for training so employees could repeat the right behavior without re-teaching.
Decision quality improved when urgent noise was separated from daily activities. By focusing on the biggest bottleneck first and anchoring key overhead conversations to actual scale, the business could make calmer decisions and build confidence that operations would not collapse when the Owner stepped away.
Transferable Value
- Operational diagnostics focused on identifying the single biggest bottleneck driving downstream chaos.
- Weekly operating cadence design for priorities, follow-up, and accountability.
- SOP creation that captures tribal knowledge and turns it into reusable training assets.
- Onboarding simplification using scripts and standard routines to reduce interruptions.
- Accountability systems that clarify ownership and reduce reminder-driven management.
- Decision hygiene practices that separate urgent noise from true constraints.
- Owner-dependency reduction by designing workflows that continue during Owner absence.
- Financial framing for overhead decisions using real scale (example: rent allocation against annual deposits).
- Leadership coaching that reinforces follow-through and consistent expectations.
- Systems-focused implementation approach that prioritizes sustainable habits over one-time fixes.

